A Federal Appeals court has upheld the law requiring ByteDance, the Chinese-owned owner of TikTok to sell the social media app by the new year or face an effective ban in the United States.
According to the Wall Street Journal, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals in Washington, D.C., unanimously rejected TikTok’s argument that the law is unconstitutional and violates the First Amendment rights of the 170 million Americans who use the app.
To this end, if ByteDance fails to sell TikTok by Jan. 19, the law will require app store companies, such as Apple and Google, and internet hosting providers to stop supporting TikTok, resulting in the app not working in the US.
President Joe Biden signed the law in April after members of Congress from both parties raised concerns about TikTok’s alleged connections to the Communist Chinese government.
However, President-elect Donald Trump has not said whether he will enforce the ban when he takes office next month.
The appeal court, in its majority opinion, found that the U.S. government had offered persuasive evidence demonstrating that” the divestment law is narrowly tailored to protect national security.”
The opinion noted that TikTok “never squarely denies that it has ever manipulated content at the direction of the People’s Republic of China.
“On the merits, we reject each of the petitioners’ constitutional claims,” wrote Judge Douglas Ginsburg in the opinion.
Read also: Google, Microsoft, TikTok, others pay N2.55 trn tax in six months
“As we shall explain, the parts of the Act that are properly before this court do not contravene the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, nor do they violate the Fifth Amendment guarantee of equal protection of the laws; constitute an unlawful bill of attainder … or work an uncompensated taking of private property in violation of the Fifth Amendment,” the opinion said.
Ginsburg noted that the law was the result of “extensive, bipartisan action by the Congress and by successive presidents.”
“It was carefully crafted to deal only with control by a foreign adversary, and it was part of a broader effort to counter a well substantiated national security threat posed by the PRC,” the judge wrote.
Troy Balderson, a representative in March, called TikTok “a surveillance tool used by the Chinese Communist Party to spy on Americans and harvest highly personal data.”
“Banning TikTok blatantly violates the First Amendment rights of millions of Americans who use this app to express themselves and communicate with people around the world,” Patrick Toomey, deputy director of the American Civil Liberties Union’s National Security Project, said.
“The government cannot shut down an entire communications platform unless it poses extremely serious and imminent harm, and there’s no evidence of that here.”
TikTok and ByteDance can ask that their appeal be reconsidered by the full lineup of judges in the D.C. federal circuit, but such requests are often rejected.
The company can ask the U.S. Supreme Court to hear the case, but there is no automatic right of appeal to that court.
According to reports, ByteDance will seek an injunction pending a planned petition to have the Supreme Court take the case.
In a September post on Truth Social, his own social media app, Trump wrote that he was not “doing anything with TikTok, but the other side is going to close it up.”
“So if you like TikTok, go out and vote for Trump,” the president-elect wrote at the time.